<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections On The Google Slapfest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/</link>
	<description>Opportunities, Opinions, Optimize</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: webduck</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>webduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>I no longer use AdSense on my blogs. To hell with them! I never made any money from them, and in fact, I took anything Google-related off my blogs just as a tiny protest. I would send the flying monkeys after them if I could!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no longer use AdSense on my blogs. To hell with them! I never made any money from them, and in fact, I took anything Google-related off my blogs just as a tiny protest. I would send the flying monkeys after them if I could!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6377</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6377</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true Stine, PR is no longer an indication of the relative quality of a website, it simply reflects Google&#039;s attempts to protect their revenue. Well I intend to protect mine.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true Stine, PR is no longer an indication of the relative quality of a website, it simply reflects Google&#8217;s attempts to protect their revenue. Well I intend to protect mine&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stine</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6348</link>
		<dc:creator>Stine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6348</guid>
		<description>I was slapped down to a 2 as well, and that may be all my site deserves, but why did I get a 3 last time? Less visits then, less incoming links, less work done on it. 
I&#039;m a bit wounded also that my new dotcom got a 0 - it&#039;s got more incoming than Kai&#039;s daughter&#039;s blog, and hasn&#039;t mentioned hockey once... 
I&#039;m with all of you - screw them, and bring on the alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was slapped down to a 2 as well, and that may be all my site deserves, but why did I get a 3 last time? Less visits then, less incoming links, less work done on it.<br />
I&#8217;m a bit wounded also that my new dotcom got a 0 &#8211; it&#8217;s got more incoming than Kai&#8217;s daughter&#8217;s blog, and hasn&#8217;t mentioned hockey once&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;m with all of you &#8211; screw them, and bring on the alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final Thoughts On The PageRank Debacle &#124; More Than Scratch The Surface</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6296</link>
		<dc:creator>Final Thoughts On The PageRank Debacle &#124; More Than Scratch The Surface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6296</guid>
		<description>[...] original thought, first voiced in the comments of Reflections On The Google Slapfest, is that Yahoo would be the ideal candidate. They must have a private ranking system already and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original thought, first voiced in the comments of Reflections On The Google Slapfest, is that Yahoo would be the ideal candidate. They must have a private ranking system already and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6295</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6295</guid>
		<description>Kai, I feel you on this one - the examples you&#039;ve given sum up the update in a nutshell: unfair, unreliable and unfathomable. PR is no longer any form of indication as to the relative worth of a site and should be done away with straight away. As Andy Beard has stated, it&#039;s almost slanderous now.

Thanks for the congrats, not sure it&#039;s deserved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kai, I feel you on this one &#8211; the examples you&#8217;ve given sum up the update in a nutshell: unfair, unreliable and unfathomable. PR is no longer any form of indication as to the relative worth of a site and should be done away with straight away. As Andy Beard has stated, it&#8217;s almost slanderous now.</p>
<p>Thanks for the congrats, not sure it&#8217;s deserved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6294</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6294</guid>
		<description>Definitely: Surely the time is right, right now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely: Surely the time is right, right now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brown Baron</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6278</link>
		<dc:creator>Brown Baron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6278</guid>
		<description>I agree with Stephen. Yahoo must have an internal ranking system in place since they have a publisher network too. 

If they create a downloadable toolbar for that .. now that would be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Stephen. Yahoo must have an internal ranking system in place since they have a publisher network too. </p>
<p>If they create a downloadable toolbar for that .. now that would be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6274</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6274</guid>
		<description>This PR update has totally blown my mind - my own domain finally got ranked - a pathetic ONE, mind you, and my blogspot blog dropped to a two.

My 12 year old daughter has a blogger blog, which has exactly THREE incoming links (I watch it like a hawk).  She talks about candy, hockey and shoes. (She is now a PR two!)  Another friend of mine also opened a blogspot blog a few months ago - she wrote like crazy for 3 weeks and then hasn&#039;t been heard from for 4 months - also a PR two!  WTF?  My own domain gets a ONE?  Granted, I haven&#039;t done much work with it, but do have a fair # of incoming links from friends and weekly memes....... technorati shows 120 incoming links.  Sigh.

I had only done two paid ads on the new site purposely, just as a test.  It makes no sense whatsoever.

Your 5 is well deserved Chris - congrats on that for sure! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This PR update has totally blown my mind &#8211; my own domain finally got ranked &#8211; a pathetic ONE, mind you, and my blogspot blog dropped to a two.</p>
<p>My 12 year old daughter has a blogger blog, which has exactly THREE incoming links (I watch it like a hawk).  She talks about candy, hockey and shoes. (She is now a PR two!)  Another friend of mine also opened a blogspot blog a few months ago &#8211; she wrote like crazy for 3 weeks and then hasn&#8217;t been heard from for 4 months &#8211; also a PR two!  WTF?  My own domain gets a ONE?  Granted, I haven&#8217;t done much work with it, but do have a fair # of incoming links from friends and weekly memes&#8230;&#8230;. technorati shows 120 incoming links.  Sigh.</p>
<p>I had only done two paid ads on the new site purposely, just as a test.  It makes no sense whatsoever.</p>
<p>Your 5 is well deserved Chris &#8211; congrats on that for sure! <img src='http://blog-op.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Cronin</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6267</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6267</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll add my voice to this - I&#039;d like to see Yahoo take this opportunity to develop an alternative (I&#039;ve already suggested this elsewhere). If they could come up with a ranking system, which is fair and updated regularly, I think people &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; adopt it. 

It has to be a big company that does this (there are several other ranking systems floating around that aren&#039;t being adopted because the company behind them aren&#039;t big enough). Who better than Yahoo? They must have an internal system that they use already and they&#039;d love to deal a blow to Google. 

Well, I just did a quick search and it seems that Yahoo did introduce WebRank in  about 2004 but it slowly faded away. Not sure what caused that, but I&#039;d like to see them try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll add my voice to this &#8211; I&#8217;d like to see Yahoo take this opportunity to develop an alternative (I&#8217;ve already suggested this elsewhere). If they could come up with a ranking system, which is fair and updated regularly, I think people <i>would</i> adopt it. </p>
<p>It has to be a big company that does this (there are several other ranking systems floating around that aren&#8217;t being adopted because the company behind them aren&#8217;t big enough). Who better than Yahoo? They must have an internal system that they use already and they&#8217;d love to deal a blow to Google. </p>
<p>Well, I just did a quick search and it seems that Yahoo did introduce WebRank in  about 2004 but it slowly faded away. Not sure what caused that, but I&#8217;d like to see them try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/comment-page-1/#comment-6266</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/#comment-6266</guid>
		<description>Cheers guys, it seems we&#039;re all in a similar spot then.

The whole episode has sunk PR for good Stephen (perhaps that was the intent?) - as you say the relative rank across similar sites is now laughable. Still, well done on the 4 and I&#039;m with you on the sponsored posts.

As I said in a previous post, nobody pays money to have an irrelevant link to their website, so Google&#039;s argument is a non-starter for me.

Matthew, I know, getting a PR 2 smarts a little,  but we&#039;ll survive!

I think it&#039;s time we all actively started promoting Yahoo &amp; other SE services, in the way we used to talk about Google.

Rhys, I think the adsense stat may be the reason they left people&#039;s SERPS alone - wouldn&#039;t want to harm their service would they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers guys, it seems we&#8217;re all in a similar spot then.</p>
<p>The whole episode has sunk PR for good Stephen (perhaps that was the intent?) &#8211; as you say the relative rank across similar sites is now laughable. Still, well done on the 4 and I&#8217;m with you on the sponsored posts.</p>
<p>As I said in a previous post, nobody pays money to have an irrelevant link to their website, so Google&#8217;s argument is a non-starter for me.</p>
<p>Matthew, I know, getting a PR 2 smarts a little,  but we&#8217;ll survive!</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s time we all actively started promoting Yahoo &#038; other SE services, in the way we used to talk about Google.</p>
<p>Rhys, I think the adsense stat may be the reason they left people&#8217;s SERPS alone &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t want to harm their service would they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
