<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sunday Poll - WWW or non-WWW?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/</link>
	<description>Opportunities, Opinions, Optimize</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Cool, which did you choose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, which did you choose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WMA</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>WMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Ok, you convinced me and I did it. I think I need to pay more attention to this kind of stuff from now on... 
Btw, I did it through google webmaster tools, without touching the .htaccess file</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, you convinced me and I did it. I think I need to pay more attention to this kind of stuff from now on&#8230;<br />
Btw, I did it through google webmaster tools, without touching the .htaccess file</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. It takes seconds, no readers will notice, but Google certainly will...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. It takes seconds, no readers will notice, but Google certainly will&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lennyp</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>lennyp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 12:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Using a redirect is such a simple fix I can't see why not to use it. Every little thing you do helps and this helps more than a lot of other things that people do to optimize their site. Why would you in essence want your back  links pointing to two different sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a redirect is such a simple fix I can&#8217;t see why not to use it. Every little thing you do helps and this helps more than a lot of other things that people do to optimize their site. Why would you in essence want your back  links pointing to two different sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-562</guid>
		<description>The key thing WMA, is that you do the re-direct, if you care about your PR. If you don't, it doesn't matter.

As I explained in my previous article, Blog-Op without the WWW is PR 4, whereas Blog-Op WITH the WWW is PR 2. 

The links going towards that PR2 are NOT being counted towards making the whole site a PR5.

Even Digg have made that mistake as Seomoz posted the other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key thing WMA, is that you do the re-direct, if you care about your PR. If you don&#8217;t, it doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>As I explained in my previous article, Blog-Op without the WWW is PR 4, whereas Blog-Op WITH the WWW is PR 2. </p>
<p>The links going towards that PR2 are NOT being counted towards making the whole site a PR5.</p>
<p>Even Digg have made that mistake as Seomoz posted the other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WMA</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>WMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Although I understand the implications, I still don't care too much about this kind of stuff (maybe I should). 

If you didn't provide the third option I probably would have went for the first one, for the same reason that Ashish has mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I understand the implications, I still don&#8217;t care too much about this kind of stuff (maybe I should). </p>
<p>If you didn&#8217;t provide the third option I probably would have went for the first one, for the same reason that Ashish has mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crunchy carpets</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>crunchy carpets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>LOL I just recently figured out what Web 2.0 was talking about in the first place.

Obviously I am stuck in Web 1.0!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL I just recently figured out what Web 2.0 was talking about in the first place.</p>
<p>Obviously I am stuck in Web 1.0!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lodge</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>True, although as long as the re-direct is in place, what they type in won't matter. More importantly, what they choose to link to, won't affect your pagerank!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, although as long as the re-direct is in place, what they type in won&#8217;t matter. More importantly, what they choose to link to, won&#8217;t affect your pagerank!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Mohta</title>
		<link>http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-op.com/the-sunday-poll-www-or-non-www/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>I would prefer www ....reason because thats what is stuffed into the world mind they just type www in any case then why not.If you are worried about inbound and all...follow the rules of the game peoperly, google will give the love to you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer www &#8230;.reason because thats what is stuffed into the world mind they just type www in any case then why not.If you are worried about inbound and all&#8230;follow the rules of the game peoperly, google will give the love to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
